Wikidébats - Contributions [fr]

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:51:38Z

Virgile :

{{sommaire|niveau=2}}

== [[Fichier:balance-debats.png|50px|bottom|link=|alt=logo débats introduction]] To understand this debate ==
=== Electronic voting definition ===
=== Implementations ===
==== Voting on dedicated e-voting machines ====
==== Internet voting ====
=== Countries that experimented with it ===

== [[Fichier:Argument pour.gif|35px|link=]] Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
==== Computers can count ballots faster ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

==== Eradicate human error from the equation ====

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
==== Less abstention ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

==== More consultations possible ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

===== Objections =====
====== Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

====== More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

====== Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 3. Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
==== Economy of paper and urns ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Less or no staff required ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Saves time for volunteers ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Fewer or no polling stations ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
===== Objections =====
====== High cost machines for small municipalities ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
===== Objections =====
====== Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
====== Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.) ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

== [[Fichier:Argument contre.gif|35px|link=]] Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
==== Flaws in computer systems ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Possibility of breakdowns ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting) ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Opacity of the machine treatment ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
===== Objections =====

====== No errors due to manual counting of votes ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
====== No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
====== Many possible security measures ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
====== Better tracking of votes ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections ====
====== Open source software / open source machines ======
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
==== Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Possibility of having someone preventing from voting ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== Risk of voting purchases ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 4. Desacralizes the very act of voting ===
Especially with internet voting
==== Voting is no longer solemn and can be done between two TV shows ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}
==== May not offer the best conditiosn to reflect on one's democratic choice ====
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===
This is the summary of this argument, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Autor Example
|citation=Quote text, Ex his quidam aeternitati se commendari posse per statuas aestimantes eas ardenter adfectant quasi plus praemii de figmentis aereis sensu carentibus adepturi, quam ex conscientia honeste recteque factorum.
|article= Article Title
|livre=Book Title example
|numéro=
|édition=Publisher example
|lieu= Place example
|date= Date example
|lien=http://source-url-example.com
}}

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:48:38Z

Virgile : /* More consultations possible */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:47:21Z

Virgile : /* Computers can count ballots faster */

Le revenu de base ne peut tenir ses promesses que s'il est d'un montant suffisant

2017-01-25T17:33:19Z

Virgile :

{{citation
|niveau-titre=6
|auteur1=Baptiste Mylondo
|citation=Les promoteurs libéraux du revenu inconditionnel proposent par exemple la suppression de tous les dispositifs de redistribution et même de certains dispositifs relevant du régime assurantiel (pensions de retraites ou allocations chômage par exemple) ! Typique de l'approche libérale, cette option ne saurait être retenue dans une version de gauche. En effet, accompagnée d'une suppression de tous les dispositifs de redistribution, la mise en place d'un revenu inconditionnel pourrait se traduire par une dégradation de la situation financière des plus démunis, surtout si le montant auquel ce revenu est fixé est particulièrement faible, comme le préconisent les libéraux...
|article=
|livre=Un revenu pour tous ! Précis d'utopie réaliste
|numéro=
|édition=Utopia
|lieu=
|date=2010
|lien=http://www.liege.mpoc.be/livres/Mylondo-Baptiste_Un-revenu-pour-tous_106p.pdf
}}

==Débats connexes==
[[Faut-il instaurer un revenu de base ?]]

[[Catégorie:Arguments détaillés autour du revenu de base]]

__NOTOC__

Le revenu de base ne peut tenir ses promesses que s'il est d'un montant suffisant

2017-01-25T17:32:48Z

Virgile : /* Citations */

{{citation
|niveau-titre=7
|auteur1=Baptiste Mylondo
|citation=Les promoteurs libéraux du revenu inconditionnel proposent par exemple la suppression de tous les dispositifs de redistribution et même de certains dispositifs relevant du régime assurantiel (pensions de retraites ou allocations chômage par exemple) ! Typique de l'approche libérale, cette option ne saurait être retenue dans une version de gauche. En effet, accompagnée d'une suppression de tous les dispositifs de redistribution, la mise en place d'un revenu inconditionnel pourrait se traduire par une dégradation de la situation financière des plus démunis, surtout si le montant auquel ce revenu est fixé est particulièrement faible, comme le préconisent les libéraux...
|article=
|livre=Un revenu pour tous ! Précis d'utopie réaliste
|numéro=
|édition=Utopia
|lieu=
|date=2010
|lien=http://www.liege.mpoc.be/livres/Mylondo-Baptiste_Un-revenu-pour-tous_106p.pdf
}}

==Débats connexes==
[[Faut-il instaurer un revenu de base ?]]

[[Catégorie:Arguments détaillés autour du revenu de base]]

__NOTOC__

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:13:21Z

Virgile : /* Computers can count ballots faster */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:02:25Z

Virgile :

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T17:01:38Z

Virgile : /* Objections */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:59:46Z

Virgile : /* 1. Is not a technically reliable system */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:58:01Z

Virgile : /* Objections */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:57:06Z

Virgile : /* 3. Makes the voting process cheaper to organize */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:55:11Z

Virgile : /* Objections */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:54:36Z

Virgile : /* Objections */

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:09:39Z

Virgile :

== [[Fichier:balance-debats.png|50px|bottom|link=|alt=logo débats introduction]] To understand this debate ==
=== Electronic voting definition ===
=== Implementations ===
==== Voting on dedicated e-voting machines ====
==== Internet voting ====
=== Countries that experimented with it ===

== {{logo argupour}} Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== {{logo argucontre}} Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Desacralizes the very act of voting ===
Especially with internet voting
* Voting is no longer solemn and can be done between two TV shows
* May not offer the best conditiosn to reflect on one's democratic choice

=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:08:33Z

Virgile :

== [[Fichier:balance-debats.png|50px|bottom|link=|alt=logo débats introduction]] To understand this debate ==
=== Electronic voting definition ===
=== Implementations ===
==== Voting on dedicated e-voting machines ====
==== Internet voting ====
=== Countries that experimented with it ===

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Desacralizes the very act of voting ===
Especially with internet voting
* Voting is no longer solemn and can be done between two TV shows
* May not offer the best conditiosn to reflect on one's democratic choice

=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:07:24Z

Virgile :

== To understand this debate ==
=== Electronic voting definition ===
=== Implementations ===
==== Voting on dedicated e-voting machines ====
==== Internet voting ====
=== Countries that experimented with it ===
== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Desacralizes the very act of voting ===
Especially with internet voting
* Voting is no longer solemn and can be done between two TV shows
* May not offer the best conditiosn to reflect on one's democratic choice

=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T16:00:02Z

Virgile : /* 4. Deactivate the vote */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Desacralizes the very act of voting ===
Especially with internet voting
* Voting is no longer solemn and can be done between two TV shows
* May not offer the best conditiosn to reflect on one's democratic choice

=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:55:12Z

Virgile : /* 3. Encourages pressure on voters */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:54:44Z

Virgile : /* 3. Encourages pressure on voters */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
Especially for internet voting since no voting booth is provided and anyone can be around we voting.
* Possibility of pressures by the entourage to vote not according to opinions
* Possibility of having someone preventing from voting
* Risk of voting purchases

=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:48:05Z

Virgile : /* 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Only citizens with technical knowledge are able to audit the system ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:46:45Z

Virgile : /* Objections: */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source software / open source machines

=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:46:08Z

Virgile : /* 1. Is not a technically reliable system */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters (especially for internet voting)
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Makes impossible physical recount of paper ballots
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes

=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:44:13Z

Virgile : /* 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Reduces the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign (flyers etc.)

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:43:13Z

Virgile : /* Makes the voting process cheaper to organize */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Less or no staff required
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:42:18Z

Virgile : /* 3. Economy of paper and urns */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== Makes the voting process cheaper to organize ===
* Economy of paper and urns
* Economy of personnel
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities

=== 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:41:22Z

Virgile : /* Objections: */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted

=== 3. Economy of paper and urns ===
* Economy of personnel
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities
=== 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:39:34Z

Virgile : /* 1. Accelerates the counting of votes */

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
* Computers can count ballots faster
* Eradicate human error from the equation

=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted
* Allows savings
=== 3. Economy of paper and urns ===
* Economy of personnel
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities
=== 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Should e-voting become a standard for elections and referendums?

2017-01-25T15:34:16Z

Virgile : First structure

== Arguments FOR ==

=== 1. Accelerates the counting of votes ===
=== 2. Encourages democratic life ===
* Less abstention
* More consultations possible
==== Objections: ====
* Reluctance / difficulties for elderly or technophobic
* More waiting time because only one polling booth per polling station
* Decrease in the participation rate observed in experiments conducted
* Allows savings
=== 3. Economy of paper and urns ===
* Economy of personnel
* Saves time for volunteers
* Fewer or no polling stations
==== Objections: ====
* High cost machines for small municipalities
=== 4. Decreases the ecological footprint of the vote ===
==== Objections: ====
* Ecological cost of manufacturing and recycling of machinery
* Most of the paper used is for the campaign

== Arguments AGAINST ==

=== 1. Is not a technically reliable system ===
* Flaws in computer systems
* Possibility of breakdowns
* Difficulty checking the identity of voters
* Opacity of the machine treatment
* Reputation voting paper impossible
==== Objections: ====
* No errors due to manual counting of votes
* No stuffing of ballot boxes as in paper vote
* Many possible security measures
* Better tracking of votes
=== 2. Must be able to be controlled by any citizen (even without technical skills) ===
==== Objections: ====
* Open source / open source machines
=== 3. Encourages pressure on voters ===
* Possibility of pressures of the entourage
* Possibility of confiscation by an apartment dictator of all voting rights
* Risk of voting purchases
=== 4. Deactivate the vote ===
* Vote as an act between an order to the Redoute and an SMS to the Star'Ac
* Context not conducive to reflection
=== 5. Was abandoned by most countries that have experienced it ===

Utilisateur:Virgile/Brouillon

2017-01-24T10:55:56Z

Virgile : Page créée avec « === Titre === »

=== Titre ===